Ethical Analysis of Children on the Internet

Ethical Analysis of Children on the Internet Children on the Internet Abeer AlSouly Ghada AlFantookh   Naima AlRashed Overview: Many people may consider the Internet as the greatest invention ever created by man. No  doubt about that if we talked about how fast knowledge exchanging has become today, or  how easy can people communicate with each other globally. Also children nowadays practice  many activities on the Internet; the most popular ones are schoolwork, social networking and  online gaming. Children’s ability to access the Internet has grown rapidly. It has made our  life much easier and it has become an essential part of modern life. Even though the benefits of the Internet are countless, it may be considered as an extremely  dangerous environment for children because some of the Internet contents can’t be controlled  and uncensored. Also children are not fully aware of how horrible and devastating the  consequences could be. However, there is no universally accepted view of what is more important whether the  education of children or protection, which is also another challenge! Also the differences in  people’s cultures and geographical location in legal and social norms reflect the lack of  common agreement. In this report, we will discuss three main issues that raise the concerns about children on the internet: The possibility that children could obverse inappropriate content in the Internet. Contact with people who seek to abuse children. Privacy risk from game sites that ask children for extensive personal and family  Information for marketing purposes. Background and The Importance of The Internet: The evolution of the Internet in the last 3 decades has been hugely improved and nowadays  we rely on it in most of our daily needs. It’s both informative and entertaining medium. Some children use it to expand their horizon  and increase their knowledge and other use it just for fun. Also these activities doesn’t require the traditional desktop computer anymore, the platforms  has increased to handheld devices such as smart phones and tablets. The Internet doesn’t just improve children mental skills but also improves their imagination  and develops their interaction skills. The ways of using the Internet and the reasons differ from child to child according to the  child age and interests. Explanation of the issues: Despite the many benefits of using the Internet and its associated services among children  there are also risks, which they must be made aware of 1. In this report we will explain some  issues such as: The possibility that children could obverse inappropriate content in the  Internet (as in Networked Communications- Children Inappropriate Content section in the  course), contact with people who seek to abuse children and privacy risk from game sites that  ask children for extensive personal and family information for marketing purposes. The possibility that children could obverse inappropriate content in the  Internet: The term inappropriate content may vary across generations and across countries and  cultures. On the other hand, there is content that is considered in all cultures as inappropriate  for children, such as the depiction of graphic violence or sexual abuse, and encouragement to  harm ones self or others. Moreover, some content can be considered as illegal, such as  violent or sexual acts against children, and the promotion of racism and xenophobia. The  different types of inappropriate content and risks that children can encounter online is  classified based on the role of the child (as recipient, participant or as actor) and the motives  of the provider (commercial, aggressive, sexual and values-related). Children inevitably  encounter content such as pornography as it is widely available on the Internet. Child  pornography in particular has important implications and considered as one of the most  serious crimes on the Internet. Sexual content, like pornographic or sexual depictions, might  cause harm to children or lead them to personal contact with potentially dangerous strangers. Contacting with people who seek to abuse children: Speaking of contacting with people who seek to abuse children, ‘British investigators flew to  America to rescue a six-year-old-girl who was being repeatedly raped on video by her father  for the gratification of members of a highly secretive internet paedophile ring.’ And many  other stories like this one appear on a regular basis. Child abuse takes new forms, leaving  social workers and parents confused about new threats that may arrive with new  technologies. Contact offences can be committed by adults where an adult commits or seeks  to commit a sexual offence on a child. Historically most child sex abuse was by a family  member or from people in his social circles. On the Internet adults who may become  involved with sexually abusing children can locate them and make the initial contact using a  different interactive, communications technologies. Usually the adult and the child will  initially meet in an Internet chat room. Committed paedophiles are known to frequent chat  rooms that are popular with children such as chat rooms related to music, fashion, or sport. The paedophile may be very skillful in communicating with children, he shows himself to the  child as a nice guy or tries to become their special friend and persuades the child to leave the  public space and go off into a private chat room. The paedophile and the child can then  arrange to continue to communicate with each other in different ways. He will ensure that the  child does not keep any record of their conversations, as sooner or later he will seek to  sexualize the contact and conversations as part of the grooming process. The effect on  children of being sexually abused is almost deeply damaging both in the short and longer  runs. A child who knew that images or a record of their abuse were out there on the Internet,  might be worried that the image could reach their classmates, neighbors or other family  members. Alternatively the image could fall into the hands of other people who know them  and who might then use it against them. Children who have be en abused in front of a web  cam similarly could never be absolutely sure that they would not meet someone who might  have witnessed their abuse and recognize them in real life. Privacy risk from game sites that ask children for extensive personal and  family information for marketing purposes: Moreover on the issues of children on the Internet, the privacy risks from game sites that  arise from asking children for extensive personal and family information for marketing  purposes. Many corporations seeking to capitalize on this market create websites that offer  games, quizzes, chat environments, and advice in order to encourage children to provide their  personal information, which can then be used to target the children with advertising, For  example Kraft, which owns Lifesavers, are interested in kids because of their spending  power. Corporations Typically, these children’s sites play into their developmental needs in  order to encourage kids to talk about themselves. Many of these sites, like Tickle.com, use  personality tests to collect information from, and market to, individual girls. These quizzes  ask detailed questions about the child’s personality, preferences, hopes, and aspirations. Since  children have to register with the si te before they can access the quizzes, the marketer is able  to record the child’s responses linked to his or her first and last name, zip/postal code, email  address, gender, marital status, and level of education. This information can also be matched  against the data trail that the child generates as she surfs through the site, selecting articles,  chatting online and playing games. Tickle also uses the information they collect to target girls  with personalized advertisements. Analysis and Evaluation: Issue (1): â€Å"The possibility that children could obverse inappropriate content in the Internet† 1. Kantianism 1st formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"Some people post graphic violence or sexual abuse or encouragement to harm  ones self or others† Universalize rule Everyone can post graphic violence or sexual abuse or encouragement to harm ones  self or others and everyone can see it. Result 1- Physiological harms to the children. 2- Children will try to apply what they see of encouragement to harm ones self or  others, which leads to death in some cases. 3- May lead them to personal contact with potentially dangerous strangers to talk  about what they had seen instead of talking with their parents. So, based on Kantianism first formulation this rule can’t be universalized which makes  it morally wrong. 2nd formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"Some people post graphic violence or sexual abuse or encouragement to harm  ones self or others† Goal People who post these kinds of posts aim to gain fame and attention of others or satisfy  their physiological desires. Mean Since everyone can see the posts including children, innocent people who shouldn’t see  this content including children will become the mean to achieve their goal. Result So, based on Kantianism second formulation this rule is morally wrong. 2. Act Utilitarianism Proposed Rule â€Å"Some people post graphic violence or sexual abuse or encouragement to harm ones  self or others† Benefits 1. Sometimes this content may be used to increase the knowledge of the child about the  inappropriate actions and things to avoid. Harms 1. Physiological harms to the children. 2. Children will try to apply what they see of encouragement to harm ones self or  others, which leads to death in some cases. 3. May lead them to personal contact with potentially dangerous strangers to talk about  what they had seen instead of talking with their parents.   Result We can see above that harms overweigh the benefits, so, based on Act Utilitarianism this  rule is morally wrong. Our point of view: The theories above all agree that it is morally wrong that people post graphic violence or  sexual abuse or encouragement to harm ones self or others on the Internet. From our point of  view, we totally agree with this result since these posts will cause physiological harms to the  children, they will try to apply what they see of encouragement to harm ones self or others  which leads to death in some cases and may lead them to personal contact with potentially  dangerous strangers to talk about what they had seen instead of talking with their parents. We  actually think these posts will kill the childhood innocence. Issue (2): â€Å"Contacting with people who seek to abuse children† 1. Kantianism à ¯Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ãƒ ¯Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  1st formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"People who seek to abuse children contact them on the Internet† Universalize rule Everyone can use the Internet to satiate their bad desires. Result 1- The Internet will become a dangerous place everyone is afraid of. 2- Crime in all of its forms is going to increase exponentially. 3- Trusted content will significantly decrease. So, based on Kantianism first formulation this rule can’t be universalized which makes it  morally wrong. à ¯Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ãƒ ¯Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  2nd formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"People who seek to abuse children contact them on the Internet† Goal People who make this kind of connection aim to satiate their desires. Mean In this rule they use the children as a mean to satiate their bad desires. Result So, based on Kantianism second formulation this rule is morally wrong. 2. Act Utilitarianism Proposed Rule â€Å"People who seek to abuse children contact them on the Internet† Benefits No benefits. Harms 1. A child who knew that images or a record of their abuse were out there on the  Internet, might be worried that the image could reach their classmates, neighbors or  other family members; which will shake his/her self-confidence. 2. Children who have been abused in front of a web cam similarly could never be  absolutely sure that they would not meet someone who might have witnessed their  abuse and recognize them in real life; which may make them prefer the isolation and  hate the social life. 3. The image of the child’s abuse could fall into the hands of other people who know  them and who might then use it against them. Result We can see above that harms overweigh the benefits, so, based on Act Utilitarianism  this rule is morally wrong. Our point of view: The theories above all agree that it is morally wrong that people who seek to abuse children  contact them on the Internet. From our point of view, this result is absolutely right, since  these kinds of communication will harm the child, shake his/her self-confidence, make them  prefer the isolation and hate the social life, the image of the child’s abuse could fall into the  hands of other people who know them and who might then use it against them also, the  Internet will become a dangerous place everyone is afraid of, crime in all of its forms is going  to increase exponentially and finally trusted content will significantly decrease. Issue (3): â€Å"Privacy risk from game sites that ask children for extensive personal and family  information for marketing purposes†. 1. Kantianism à ¯Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ãƒ ¯Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  1st formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"Game sites collect personal and family information from children for marketing  purposes† Universalize  rule Everyone can collect private information from children. Result 1- May result in child giving her/his parents’ credit card number or financial  information. 2- Crime in many of its forms is going to increase, since many of the private  information had been leaked. 3- Blackmail propagation. So, based on Kantianism first formulation this rule can’t be universalized which makes it  morally wrong. à ¯Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ãƒ ¯Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  2nd formulation: Proposed Rule â€Å"Game sites collect personal and family information from children for marketing  purposes† Goal People who collect these information aim to promote for their products or services in  order to increase their revenue. Mean In this rule they use the children as a mean to collect the personal and family  information needed for this promotion. Result So, based on Kantianism second formulation this rule is morally wrong. 2. Act Utilitarianism Proposed Rule â€Å"Game sites collect personal and family information from children for marketing  purposes† Benefits 1. Child would benefit from enjoying playing the games. 2. Some of these games may enhance his/her intelligence and his/her way of thinking. 3. Corporations will suggest the appropriate games based on the collected information  (ex: age, gender, interests, etc.) ; so both parties will benefit. Harms 1. Parents or any of the family members of the child will receive so many annoying  spam emails. 2. Corporations sell these personal and family information to other corporations without  the permission of the information’s owner. 3. Parents or any of the family members of the child may receive many annoying sales  or advertisements’ phone calls or SPIMs*. 4. All of the above wastes the target’s time, since the information had been collected  without his/her permission which means (s)he’s not interested in these  advertisements. * SPIM: Stands for Spam Instance Messaging. Result We can see above that harms overweigh the benefits, so, based on Act Utilitarianism  this rule is morally wrong. Our point of view: The theories above all agree that it is morally wrong to collect personal and family  information from children for marketing purposes. Also, from our point of view we agree  with this result, because the parents or any of the family members of the child will receive so  many annoying spam emails, their information will be exchanged between the companies  without their permission and they also will receive so many annoying sales or  advertisements’ phone calls. These things wastes so much time especially if the targeted  person is not interested in these advertisements. Summary and conclusions: To summaries, the Internet today has a very useful and important resources and a lot of  schools depend on it almost completely, but also there is no clear accepted view that will  everyone agree on when it comes to also protection. We had explained some issues such as: The possibility that children could obverse inappropriate content in the Internet which prove  to be morally wrong based on Kantianism, Act Utilitarianism and from our point of view,  contact with people who seek to abuse children and privacy risk from game sites that ask  children for extensive personal which prove to be morally wrong based on Kantianism, Act  Utilitarianism and from our point of view and family information for marketing purposes  which prove to be morally wrong based on Kantianism, Act Utilitarianism and from our point  of view. Eventually, we know that we can’t prevent the children from accessing the Internet; instead  we can apply parental control over what the children can access. Moreover, children should  be aware of the consequences of what their actions may lead to. Various laws have been  passed to protect the children nowadays such as; The Child Online Protection Act (COPA),  which was passed to restrict access by minors to any material, defined as harmful to such  minors on the Internet5 and the Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA)  Ã¢â‚¬Å"which was designed to limit the collection and use of personal information about children by  the operators of Internet services and Web sites†6. References:   [1] S. Livingstone, L. Haddon.(2009, Sep 30). Kids Online: Opportunities and Risks for  Children. (1st Edition). [On-line]. Available:  http://books.google.com.sa/books?id=aPsXzcjf9vMCprintsec=frontcoverdq=Kids+Online+bookhl=ensa=Xei=SeaBVLrSAcisU5fSgPAPredir_esc=y#v=onepageq=Kids%20Online%20bookf=false [Nov. 15, 2014]. [2] O’NEILL S (2002), Paedophile Squad Saves Girl, 6, from Rapist Father, Daily Telegraph,  3 July 2002, p. 7. [3] J. Carr. â€Å"child abuse, child pornography and the internet.† NCH (National Childrens  Homes) (Dec, 2003). [4] V. Steeves.(2006). â€Å"It’s Not Child’s Play: The Online Invasion of Children’s Privacy.†Ã‚  University of Ottawa Law Technology Journal. Available:  http://www.uoltj.ca/articles/vol3.1/2006.3.1.uoltj.Steeves.169-188.pdf?origin=publication_detail [Nov. 17, 2014]. [5] A. Carr. (2013, Feb 26). Child Protection. (1st Edition). [On-line]. Available:  http://books.google.com.sa/books?id=UwKfxyy_S2cCprintsec=frontcoverhl=ar#v=onepageqf=false [Dec. 5, 2014]. [6] â€Å"ChildrenS Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).† Internet:  http://www.inc.com/encyclopedia/childrens-online-privacy-protection-act-COPPA.html, [Dec. 5, 2014].

Early Childhood Education Compare & Contrast Paper Essay

As early childhood educators we all have our own philosophies and approaches to education. There are several types of early childhood programs. Each program has its own philosophies, methods, and program goals. Every early childhood educator is unique making each early childhood program experience special. Consistently, early childhood programs offer educational foundations that prepare young students for their educational futures. In this paper I will focus on comparing and contrasting two programs that stood out to me, Ridgeline Montessori and the Whitaker Head Start. When examining early childhood programs there are many similarities and differences across the board. After observing both programs, I noticed that both schools have benefited from tailoring the services and programs provided to their communities. It helps early childhood programs become more effective at reaching their students. These two programs focus on providing services to two different communities of families, however, they both have the same goals in preparing students for formal schooling. The environment of each of these two programs differs in many ways. Due to the different methods, curriculum, level of family involvement, resources, funding, and teacher’s available programs can differ in structure. Some programs are built on models based upon psychological theories and principals, while others are more focused on students’ interests and individual needs. Ridgeline Montessori school is a free public charter school that is offered to any students in the community, through a lottery system. Students who don’t initially get in are placed on a wait list in the order in which they applied. Read Also:  Compare and Contrast Essay Topics for Elementary Students Even though Ridgeline is a public charter school, many low-income families may not be aware of the opportunity or have the resources to send their children there. Head Start on the other hand is a national federally funded program, in which enrollment is based on family income. Head Start also has a wait list and there are many families who have to wait to get into the program. The difference in program eligibility creates a difference in the types of families and children that enter these programs. Most students enrolled at Ridgeline come from middle class families, where they do not have to worry about their basic needs being met. This allows these students families to be more involved helping channel their energy and attention towards learning. Head Start children, on the other hand, usually come from low-income families, in which meeting their basic needs can be an everyday challenge. The differences in these two home environments play an intricate role in the set up and implementation of each program. The Head Start program focuses not only on educating young children, but also making sure that they’re socially, emotionally, and physically healthy. Head Start programs provide families with services that ensure students are receiving adequate nutrition, proper care, and that there basic needs are being met. Ridgeline Montessori offered free and reduced lunches at one time, however, due to the lack of need for this service, the program was cut. Students’ at Ridgeline seem to have less of a need for services and therefore, more focus is put forth on education and learning. Ridgeline Montessori uses the Montessori method, which was developed by Maria Montessori. The Montessori method views children as being unique individuals in which each child has their own interests and learning potential. The classroom and materials are prepared in advance, with manipulatives set up all around the classroom. At first glance the classroom looked similar to the classrooms I previously observed, however, with further examination I noticed many differences. One of the most noticeable differences I detected upon walking into the Montessori classroom was the noise level. The classroom seemed rather quiet considering the number of students. The layout of the classroom is much different. Instead of having several different designated centers the whole classroom is a center for exploration and learning. Materials and manipulatives are spread along the outside walls of the classroom and children are free to choose which type of materials they would like to work with during independent work time. You do not notice any individual desks and chairs set up in the classroom, rather a few tables and chairs grouped together. The furniture is all child size and you do not see any adult sized furniture throughout the classroom. Students spend most of their time working on the floor where they have their own individual carpets. They put them down to outline their personal workspace. Instead of there being various toys and games spread through out the classroom, there are specific sensory materials and manipulatives that are self correcting and purposeful to student’s learning. On the walls students’ work fill spaces throughout the classroom, similar to the walls of a Head Start classroom. Montessori classrooms are made up of mixed grades and ages, something that is not typical of traditional classrooms. The Head Start program I visited uses a more traditional comprehensive method. Students are all close to the same age. Since the program is federally funded there is much emphasis put on performance standards and teaching objectives. The classrooms at Head Start are a center based classroom with different areas for pretend play, math manipulatives, language/ reading/ writing area/ art exploration, blocks and large motor, water play, sand table etc. There is a group area for circle time activities and line time. The classroom time normally starts out with calendar work or story time. Children then tell the teacher what center or â€Å"key experience† they will start on and they choose work. Students are free to move from center to center as they choose as long as they stay somewhat involved in something and are not bothering others. Students don’t have to go to any center they are not interested in although a teacher may suggest an interesting activity to a child who has stuck to the blocks for a few days. Classrooms tend to be lively with a hum of activity. Materials are often brightly colored and made to imitate real life materials. There are specific skills and concepts that each center is aimed to teach students. Throughout the classroom there are individual desks and chairs for students to sit at or large cooperative tables to work at. Students also have a specific spot on the large rug where story time and group time takes place. In the Head Start classroom the teacher’s role is well defined, the teacher is responsible for implementing and directing the classroom activities. Head Start teachers are required to have at least a two-year degree and must complete a certain amount of educational training hours. Teachers’ are also expected to complete home visits, where they visit their student’s homes. Teachers direct the classroom activities and dictate what materials will be covered throughout the day; however, students do have periods of time where they get to decide what they want to work on. Student’s interests shape the Montessori teachers’ role in the classroom. Teachers are expected to allow the individual interests of the students to shape the activities of the day. The teacher is responsible for preparing the classroom environment that is educationally interesting and safe. The teacher acts as a guide, initially introducing a new concept to a student. Then the teacher will observe and analyze as the student works with the new concept, until mastering it. Montessori teachers go through special training to become a certified Montessori teacher. Teachers are required to maintain regular communications with the parents and guardians of students. Teachers are also expected to keep good documentation of the students’ growth and progress. Both Head Start and Ridgeline strive to develop a high level of family and community involvement. Head Start requires home visits and parenting classes for some families. The program is set up, to not only help the child get on track and ready for formal schooling, but also help the parents and guardians be prepared for the process as well. Ridgeline requires that parents and guardians volunteer or help out in the classroom at least 40 hours a year. Both programs put great emphasis on family involvement. Since Ridgeline is a Montessori school the curriculum is already set up. It is shaped by a sequence of three broad phases. These phases include: exercises for practical life, sensory education and language activities. The rate at which the students move through the areas of curriculum is directly related to the student’s mastery of each sequenced level. There is also a great importance put on learning through the senses and all materials and manipulatives are meant to be aesthetically appealing. The Montessori method uses five basic principles as the foundation for the program: respect for the child, auto-corrections, prepared environments, sensitive periods, and absorbent mind. These five principles are the guides for all Montessori programs. The Head Start curriculum is quit different from the Montessori curriculum. Head Start uses a traditional high/scope curriculum which is emergent, meaning it is not planned in advance. In the same way that student’s interests shape the Montessori curriculum, students’ help to determine the curriculum in a Head Start program. Plan-do-review is the teaching-learning cycle that is implemented throughout Head Start programs. In the Plan-do-review teachers and students plan out what they are going to do, do it, and then review the outcome with the classroom community. Since Head Start is federally funded the curriculum must meet national and state standards. The Whitaker Head Start I observed used routine and structure to help guide students throughout the curriculum and the day. The predictability of the day’s routine help student’s to know what is next in the day. Montessori schools work off a philosophy of respect for student’s abilities and interests. The main idea is to allow children to explore, grow and develop at their own pace. Head Start works off of a philosophy which promotes equality in social and emotional growth. The main idea is to provide students and families with the tools and resources to help prepare young children for formal schooling. Both programs are critical and beneficial to the students and families they serve.

Educational Assistance Essay

I am currently employed as a bagger at H-E-B and would very much like to be considered for the educational assistance program you offer to employees. I want to go to college to be a pharmacist when I complete high school and am already taking a pharmacy technician class along with my other classes. I know H-E-B is a wonderful place to work, not just because I already work there but because my father has worked as a truck driver there for 15 years. H-E-B is very steady, has good benefits and most importantly, treats their employees like family. I can’t think of any other workplace that can keep their employees loyalty like that. I know there is a growing need for pharmacists and with the way H-E-B has added deli’s, floral dept and pharmacies to keep up with today’s markets, I can get my degree and become a part of all that. Pharmacists are in need more and more and cannot think of anywhere I would rather put my degree to work than H-E-B. All I ask for is the chance to become a registered pharmacist and join the pharmacy staff at H-E-B. This company has been around for 100 years and with the loyalty of people like myself and my father, will be around for many more. This is my chance to fulfill my dream of becoming a pharmacist and advance my career within a company I care about. I sincerely hope you will grant my request for educational assistance and help me make continue the H-E-B tradition of quality service and a family atmosphere. If you approve my request, I will work hard to make you glad you gave this opportunity and when I become a pharmacist, I will able to help the people who work and shop H-E-B on a regular basis.

Rhetorical Analysis Of Brother Dean - 865 Words

Jackeline Aguilar Rhetorical Analysis on Brother Dean Brother Dean is a campus preacher that is talking about controversial topics like rape, feminism, and gay people. He uses the bible to back up the statements that he makes. Brother Dean walks around the campus of the University of Arizona wearing shirts with the statements â€Å"you whore† and signs that say â€Å"you deserve rape†. He is walking around and essentially slut shaming women because he states that they get raped because they wear revealing clothes. The day that he was being filmed by Vice was the release of Brave Miss World, a movie about a women named Linor Abargil who was abducted, stabbed and raped weeks before she won a pageant . He was protesting the release of the film†¦show more content†¦He does not talk in long speeches about his beliefs because a lot of the students on campus do not have the time to stop and listen to him. Instead he talks really fast and attempts to persuade people to believe in his statements as they pass by. His preac hings are mostly based on christianity and the bible. He never uses anything else to back his believes besides the bible. Brother Dean is using the bible as a weapon to persuade others to join him, proving that he is cultured. The reason Brother Dean is going on campus and preaching is so that he can get people to convert. As Nissi Powell, a student on campus said, he is only trying to get people’s attention with his remarks. He is doing it in a wrong way because a lot of people do not respond well when they are being attacked with words. He could have tried a more effective way to get people to listen to him if he talked about the religion itself. He could have mentioned what a day in mass was like or passages from the bible that were positive. Due to his strident approach, he has caused chaos and violence towards him. People have started to rip his shirt, throw away his signs, and has had a smoothie thrown at him. His hobby has had a lot a controversy but some women do agree with him like his friend Sarah. She claims that women put themselves in situations without needing to be there. She also states that she agrees with everything brother DeanShow MoreRelated Twain’s Huckleberry Finn a nd Kerouac’s On the Road – The River and the Road3035 Words   |  13 PagesAmerican literature. The similarities between Huckleberry Finn and On the Road are numerous and worth consideration because they depict the hand in hand progression (one following the other in successive centuries) of novels that use similar rhetorical devices to express the condition of society. Mark Twain’s influence upon Kerouac is evident in On the Road as is suggested in biographical details. Warren French states in his biography of Kerouac that Kerouac’s first attempt to write a novel atRead MoreAp European History Outline Chapter 10 Essay example5639 Words   |  23 Pages judges, and doctors * Despotism in Florence * Cosimo’s grandson, Lorenzo the Magnificent, ruled Florence in a totalitarian fashion during the last quarter century of the fifteenth century * Lorenzo’s brother had been assassinated by a rival family, the Pazzi, who had long plotted with the pope against the Medicis which made Lorenzo a cautious ruler * Despotism throughout Renaissance Italy * Oligarchies, or a small group of wealthyRead More «Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland »7735 Words   |  31 PagesTo provide the theoretical background for dealing with Lexical Devices, Syntactical Stylistic Devices, Lexico-Syntactical Stylistic Devices and Graphical Expressive means. †¢ To make a stylistic analysis of the novel, defining expressive means which were used by the author and providing the analysis with the examples from the text of the novel. The practical value of the paper consists in analyzing the novel from the point of view of lexicology and stylistics. It should be mentioned thatRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 PagesChbosky. Word Riot. Word Riot. Retrieved 27 May 2012. 41.Jump up ^ Tara Ann Carter (October 6, 2013). Reading Persepolis: Defining and Redefining Culture, Gender and Genre (PDF). John Bartram High School. 42.Jump up ^ Secret Life of Bees-Character Analysis. Archived from the original on 3 May 2011. Retrieved 2011-04-21. 43.Jump up ^ Khaled Hosseini (March 4, 1965). Katherine C. (Berwyn, PA) s review of The Kite Runner. Goodreads.com. Retrieved 2011-04-21. 44.Jump up ^ http://www.salon.com/2003/09/12/lethem_8//Read MoreEssay on Silent Spring - Rachel Carson30092 Words   |  121 Pagesplease visit: http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-silentspring/ Copyright Information  ©2000-2007 BookRags, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The following sections of this BookRags Premium Study Guide is offprint from Gales For Students Series: Presenting Analysis, Context, and Criticism on Commonly Studied Works: Introduction, Author Biography, Plot Summary, Characters, Themes, Style, Historical Context, Critical Overview, Criticism and Critical Essays, Media Adaptations, Topics for Further Study, CompareRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagesbe welcomed by organization theory scholars and reflective practitioners and is a valuable companion for scholars and students of organization theory. Henk W. Volberda, Chair of the Department of Strategic Management Business Environment and Vice-Dean of the RSM Erasmus University, Netherlands At last, a text that brings organization theory into the 21st century! This is the first organization theory textbook to provide full and informed coverage of a range of contemporary developments in the fieldRead MoreLogi cal Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesShirley J. Bell, University of Arkansas at Monticello; Phyllis Berger, Diablo Valley College; Kevin Galvin, East Los Angeles College; Jacquelyn Ann Kegley, California State University-Bakersfield; Darryl Mehring, University of Colorado at Denver; Dean J. Nelson, Dutchess Community College; James E. Parejko, Chicago State University; Robert Sessions, Kirkwood Community College; and Stephanie Tucker, California State University Sacramento. Thinking and writing about logical reasoning has been enjoyableRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesDesign: Jayne Conte Cover Art: Getty Images, Inc. Cover Design: Suzanne Duda Lead Media Project Manager: Denise Vaughn Full-Service Project Management: Sharon Anderson/BookMasters, Inc. Composition: Integra Software Services Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers Cover Printer: Coral Graphics Text Font: 10/12 Weidemann-Book Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on appropriate page within text. Copyright  © 2011, 2007, 2005, 2002